Laserfiche WebLink
Prescott City Council Regular Voting Meeting —August 8, 2006 Page 5 <br /> ... Councilwoman Suttles asked if more studies would be done and the project <br /> would continue into Prescott Valley and Mr. Hammit replied Prescott Valley <br /> was working on a different approach for the development expected along <br /> SR69, such as a curb median and added the barriers could be taken out as <br /> signals were warranted along the route. <br /> B. Presentation by Representative on State Proposition No. 105, State <br /> Trust Land. <br /> Bas Aja, representing the Cattleman's Association, presented the following <br /> information regarding Proposition 105: <br /> • Both Proposition 105 and 106 were Constitutional amendments and <br /> should not be taken lightly. <br /> • Proposition 105 had two components: (1) was a new, modern planning <br /> tool, and (2) was a mechanism for conservation for State Trust Land. <br /> Also allows for public right of way with no publication requirements. <br /> • It allowed for the disposition of easements and public rights-of-way <br /> without advertising, auction or compensation. <br /> • Proposition 106 allowed the bureaucrats at the Land Department to take <br /> money from the Trust; the fund which currently was designated for <br /> education and schools should remain untouched and allowed to grow for <br /> the future. <br /> • It did not create a Board of Trustees. <br /> C. Presentation by Representative on State Proposition No. 106, <br /> Conserving Arizona's Future. <br /> Patrick Graham, State Director for The Nature Conservancy, presented the <br /> following information: <br /> • Primary goals were to (1) conserve land for open space and protection <br /> of water sources; (2) require State Land Department to follow local <br /> plans; (3) achieve more timely disposal of State Trust Land suitable for <br /> development; and (4) increase funding for classrooms and teacher <br /> salaries. <br /> • The initiative would reportedly designate nearly 65,000 acres of State <br /> Trust Lands within the Big Chino Subbasin and Prescott area as either <br /> permanently or provisionally reserved. <br /> • The U.S. Congress would have to amend the Arizona-New Mexico <br /> Enabling Act by 2009 before this could be enacted. <br /> • Proposition 105 would reduce revenues by conserving lands without <br /> compensation. <br />