My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC - Agendas - City Council - REGULAR - 8/29/2006
>
City Clerk
>
Permanent Records
>
Permanent
>
CC - Agendas - City Council - REGULAR - 8/29/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2022 4:28:20 PM
Creation date
3/2/2022 11:10:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC - Agendas
Department
City Clerk
Sub
Clerk Records
Content
Agendas
Committee Status
Current
Document Type
City Council
Meeting Type
REGULAR
Meeting Date
8/29/2006
Retention
Permanent
Retention Type
Permanent
Security
Public
Scanner
COP\torey.dawson
Scan Date
3/2/2022
Record Series
GS1016, #10260
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Prescott City Council Study Session —August 15, 2006 Page 7 <br /> .•► Community Development Director Tom Guice explained this was a three <br /> part item - the first was the public hearing scheduled for August 29; the <br /> second was to consider the preliminary plat of 36 lots on 19.5 acres; and <br /> the third was the water service agreement for 12.6 acre feet of water. <br /> Following a query by Councilman Luzius regarding input from the public <br /> today, Mayor Simmons clarified there would be no input until the Public <br /> Hearing on the 29th, as that was the date published for the Public Hearing. <br /> A gentleman from the audience asked to be heard today as he would not <br /> be able to attend the August 29 meeting. Mayor Simmons clarified today <br /> was not the Public Hearing and no input would be taken. <br /> Attorney Gary Kidd reminded the Council State Statutes required a Public <br /> Hearing be noticed and the notices said the 29th and the agenda clearly <br /> stated the Public Hearing would be August 29th. If the Public Hearing was <br /> opened today it would violate State Statutes because it wasn't properly <br /> noticed that way. Written comments could be submitted to Mr. Guice if <br /> residents couldn't attend the meeting. <br /> The gentleman asked if he could make a brief statement; Mayor Simmons <br /> said there would be no public input today because it had been published <br /> for the Public Hearing to be held on the 29th; however, he would read the <br /> gentleman's statement on the 29th if he would submit something in writing. <br /> Mr. Guice responded to an audience member (whose comment was <br /> inaudible) that notices were sent out that the public hearing would be held <br /> on August 22nd; then the Council cancelled the August 22nd meeting and <br /> rescheduled it for August 29th and new corrected notices were then hand- <br /> delivered to residents in the surrounding areas. <br /> Christina Johnson, 252 South Virginia Street, remarked they had received <br /> several notices from the City and others and asked Mayor Simmons what <br /> would be studied today and he replied nothing would be studied today and <br /> explained the public hearing was noticed to be held on August 29t and <br /> that was when everyone would have an opportunity to speak. <br /> Attorney Gary Kidd repeated the Statutes required the property owners <br /> within 300 feet be notified by mail, the notice be posted and the public <br /> hearing held. All Statutes had been followed properly. <br /> Robert Reuillard, 7848 N. Sunset Ridge in Prescott Valley, said it was <br /> clearly communicated that the 15th was the Study Session and the voting <br /> session would be the 22nd, which was later revised to the 29th. Many <br /> ,., people had showed up today, including the Tenney's and surrounding <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.