Laserfiche WebLink
Prescott City Council Study Session —August 15, 2006 Page 7 <br /> .•► Community Development Director Tom Guice explained this was a three <br /> part item - the first was the public hearing scheduled for August 29; the <br /> second was to consider the preliminary plat of 36 lots on 19.5 acres; and <br /> the third was the water service agreement for 12.6 acre feet of water. <br /> Following a query by Councilman Luzius regarding input from the public <br /> today, Mayor Simmons clarified there would be no input until the Public <br /> Hearing on the 29th, as that was the date published for the Public Hearing. <br /> A gentleman from the audience asked to be heard today as he would not <br /> be able to attend the August 29 meeting. Mayor Simmons clarified today <br /> was not the Public Hearing and no input would be taken. <br /> Attorney Gary Kidd reminded the Council State Statutes required a Public <br /> Hearing be noticed and the notices said the 29th and the agenda clearly <br /> stated the Public Hearing would be August 29th. If the Public Hearing was <br /> opened today it would violate State Statutes because it wasn't properly <br /> noticed that way. Written comments could be submitted to Mr. Guice if <br /> residents couldn't attend the meeting. <br /> The gentleman asked if he could make a brief statement; Mayor Simmons <br /> said there would be no public input today because it had been published <br /> for the Public Hearing to be held on the 29th; however, he would read the <br /> gentleman's statement on the 29th if he would submit something in writing. <br /> Mr. Guice responded to an audience member (whose comment was <br /> inaudible) that notices were sent out that the public hearing would be held <br /> on August 22nd; then the Council cancelled the August 22nd meeting and <br /> rescheduled it for August 29th and new corrected notices were then hand- <br /> delivered to residents in the surrounding areas. <br /> Christina Johnson, 252 South Virginia Street, remarked they had received <br /> several notices from the City and others and asked Mayor Simmons what <br /> would be studied today and he replied nothing would be studied today and <br /> explained the public hearing was noticed to be held on August 29t and <br /> that was when everyone would have an opportunity to speak. <br /> Attorney Gary Kidd repeated the Statutes required the property owners <br /> within 300 feet be notified by mail, the notice be posted and the public <br /> hearing held. All Statutes had been followed properly. <br /> Robert Reuillard, 7848 N. Sunset Ridge in Prescott Valley, said it was <br /> clearly communicated that the 15th was the Study Session and the voting <br /> session would be the 22nd, which was later revised to the 29th. Many <br /> ,., people had showed up today, including the Tenney's and surrounding <br />