My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC - Agendas - City Council - REGULAR - 8/29/2006
>
City Clerk
>
Permanent Records
>
Permanent
>
CC - Agendas - City Council - REGULAR - 8/29/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2022 4:28:20 PM
Creation date
3/2/2022 11:10:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC - Agendas
Department
City Clerk
Sub
Clerk Records
Content
Agendas
Committee Status
Current
Document Type
City Council
Meeting Type
REGULAR
Meeting Date
8/29/2006
Retention
Permanent
Retention Type
Permanent
Security
Public
Scanner
COP\torey.dawson
Scan Date
3/2/2022
Record Series
GS1016, #10260
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
roe `N.1 <br /> 'rktzo�r <br /> City of Prescott, Arizona <br /> Public Report <br /> Parks, Recreation, Library, Police, Fire, and Public Buildings & Fleet Impact <br /> Fees Update <br /> January 24, 2006 (Revised June 6, 2006) <br /> Background <br /> In 1982, the state legislature responded to the rapid growth in the state by passing legislation that <br /> allows municipalities to assess development impact fees to offset the costs incurred in providing <br /> public services to the new development. Arizona Revised Statutes Section 9-463.05 provides the <br /> statutory authority for the imposition of impact fees. The City of Prescott Charter also provides <br /> authority in Article 1 Section 3. <br /> A development impact fee is a one-time fee paid when a building permit is issued; it is intended to <br /> have new development pay a fair and proportionate share of new capital facilities required to serve <br /> the development. There must be a reasonable relationship between costs of facilities required to <br /> service the new development and the amount of the impact fee. The new facilities must be a direct <br /> result of the new growth; they are not intended to be used for operational expenses or to pay for <br /> capital improvements to correct an existing deficiency or shortfall. <br /> Development fees are required to evaluate possible credits. Future revenue credits were considered <br /> to avoid potential double payment for capital facilities.The Streets impact fee was the only impact <br /> fee that has a credit to offset the Streets and Open Space 1% privilege tax. The Streets impact fee is <br /> not part of this study and will be presented separately in the future. <br /> The second type of credit is a site-specific credit for system improvements that have been included <br /> in the development fee calculations. Project improvements normally required as part of the <br /> development approval process are not eligible for credits against development fees. Specific <br /> policies and procedures related to site-specific credits for system improvements are addressed in <br /> the ordinance that establishes the City's fees. However, the general concept is that developers may <br /> be eligible for site-specific credits or reimbursements only if they provide system improvements <br /> that have been included in the development fee calculation schedule. <br /> City History <br /> In 1994, the City contracted with nationally recognized impact fee consulting firm Tischler & <br /> Associates, to perform a feasibility analysis of potential impact fees for the City. A Citizen Advisory <br /> Committee on Development Impact Fees was formed to analyze the fees and underlying formulas <br /> and determined the methodology to be valid. <br /> In May 1995, the City collected the first impact fees for recreation, parks, library, police, fire, and <br /> streets. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.