My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC - Agendas - City Council - STUDY SESSION - 2/14/2023
>
City Clerk
>
Permanent Records
>
Permanent
>
CC - Agendas - City Council - STUDY SESSION - 2/14/2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 11:14:26 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 11:09:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC - Agendas
Department
City Clerk
Sub
Clerk Records
Content
Agendas
Committee Status
Current
Document Type
City Council
Meeting Type
STUDY SESSION
Meeting Date
2/14/2023
Retention
Permanent
Retention Type
Permanent
Security
Public
Scanner
COP\sarah.siep
Scan Date
2/9/2023
Record Series
GS1016, #10260
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Community First - Courage, Grit, and Duty - Driven by Excellence <br /> <br /> Page 18 <br /> <br />Stakeholder Input and Engagement <br /> <br />2019 Strategic Plan Stakeholder Outreach <br />The 2019 process engaged stakeholders in a traditional in-person format and is represented here to <br />show alignment with the findings of the 2022 process. While it was not formally a part of this update, it <br />is relevant and shows the key assumptions remain unchanged. Both the business community, and citizen <br />stakeholders were invited to participate. Below is a high-level summary of the findings of that <br />engagement. Each group was asked report their planning priorities for the department, which services <br />they felt were the most important, and their general opinions of the overall state of the department. <br />Those in attendance (13) did not constitute statistical validation but should be viewed as a potential <br />indicator of the business community’s general leanings. <br />Figure 1. Business Community Planning Priorities <br /> <br />The attendees were given the preceding list of values or planning elements and given a forced choice: <br />comparing each element to all of the others to decide which was the most important (e.g., technical <br />competence versus contain costs, technical competence versus maintain response times, etc.). The total <br />value possible cumulatively is 65 per planning element. The results are illustrated in Figure 1, reflecting <br />that the group prioritized expanding staffing and deployment over every other planning element, <br />followed closely by improving response times and then reliable equipment and facilities, ensuring the <br />technical competence of PFD personnel, maintaining response times, and finally containing costs. <br />6 <br />23 <br />46 <br />37 <br />38 <br />45 <br />0 10 20 30 40 50 <br />Contain Costs to Taxpayers <br />Maintain Existing Response Times <br />Ensure Technical Competence <br />Reliable Equip./Facilities <br />Improve Response Time <br />Expand Staffing/Deployment <br />←Low Priority High Priority → <br />97
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.