My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC - Agendas - City Council - STUDY SESSION - 2/14/2023
>
City Clerk
>
Permanent Records
>
Permanent
>
CC - Agendas - City Council - STUDY SESSION - 2/14/2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 11:14:26 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 11:09:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC - Agendas
Department
City Clerk
Sub
Clerk Records
Content
Agendas
Committee Status
Current
Document Type
City Council
Meeting Type
STUDY SESSION
Meeting Date
2/14/2023
Retention
Permanent
Retention Type
Permanent
Security
Public
Scanner
COP\sarah.siep
Scan Date
2/9/2023
Record Series
GS1016, #10260
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Community First - Courage, Grit, and Duty - Driven by Excellence <br /> <br /> Page 19 <br />Figure 2. Business Community Service Priorities <br /> <br />In the same session as just discussed, the attendees were given a list of current services provided by the <br />fire department, which were described. The choices were to assign a 3 (critical priority), a 2 (important <br />priority), or a 1 (low priority) to the list of services. The respondents were allowed to assign as many 3s, <br />2s, or 1s as they wished and were also allowed to strike through any service, they felt the fire <br />department should not be providing or add a service the individual respondents believed was missing <br />from what should be provided. No attendees struck through any services, but two attendees separately <br />added “EMTs well-checking frequent system users or post discharge patients.” <br />The group prioritized advanced life support (paramedic) services as the most critical service offered by <br />PFD, followed by fire suppression, hazardous materials, and technical rescue response. Fuels <br />management, community risk reduction (prevention), and public education were scored lowest, but still <br />at or above an important priority. <br />Finally, the attendees were given an opinion poll, where they were asked to check the one box under <br />each of the headings in Figure 3 that most described their perspective. <br />Figure 3. Staff/Response/Cost Opinion Options <br />Staffing Response Performance Cost of Service <br /> Overstaffed Response too heavy Too expensive <br /> Staffed appropriately Response appropriate Appropriate <br /> Understaffed Response too slow/light Underfunded <br />The results of the opinion poll are reflected in Figure 4. <br />1.92 <br />2.00 <br />2.08 <br />2.31 <br />2.46 <br />2.69 <br />2.92 <br />0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 <br />Public Education <br />Community Risk Reduction (Prevention) <br />Fuels Management <br />Technical Rescue <br />Hazardous Materials Team <br />Fire Suppression <br />EMS (Paramedics) <br />←Low Priority High Priority → <br />98
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.