Laserfiche WebLink
8.A.c I <br /> Prescott City Council <br /> Study Session Meeting — 11/07/2017 Page 4 <br /> (FAA) requirements such as runway protection zones and protection of the airport. The <br /> noise contours and avigation easements and further protections when you put <br /> residential near an airport would have a long term impact on airport funds and its <br /> employees. Mayor Oberg asked if they are looking at contouring lines based on the old <br /> master plan. Ms. Baker said that it is based on the old airport master plans as the new <br /> master plans have not be updated at this time. However, cautions have been taken into <br /> consideration and conservative routes have been taken with regard to the data analysis. <br /> It was further determined that knowledge of the contour lines will be identified in the first <br /> quarter of next year once approved by the FAA. There are concerns with regard to the <br /> land compatibility grant assurance with regard to zoning and land compatibility. Impact a <br /> zones 1, 2 and 3 and encroachment were identified. Regardless of the outcome of the <br /> Deep Well Ranch there will be an increase to the airport fund due to residential being <br /> close to the airport which will result in more noise complaints and investigations, low <br /> flying aircraft calls which may impact the fund toward the airport and its employees as c <br /> the grant provides no money for noise attenuation. Ms. Baker summarized that it was a <br /> better option for the airport to accept the master plan based on current zoning and what a <br /> is being proposed. In addition, the possibility for near open space is better than the <br /> possibility of industrial use which could pose a safety risk to pilots, residents and .° <br /> businesses. <br /> G1 <br /> Daniel Mattson, citizen, wanted to point out that when the General Plan committee was <br /> discussing future development, the Deep Well Ranch area would be ideal for future <br /> growth and best fit for the city. If we didn't have the master plan we would be worse off. o_ <br /> The details still need to be worked out. He acknowledged the James family and their <br /> contributions to the city. He suggested not allowing anything that would limit the growth cn <br /> of the airport. ; <br /> Patti Shaffer, citizen, discussed global warming, climate change, polarization, the <br /> planetary boundary theory and water sheds. Ms. Shaffer suggested to keep half the <br /> water in the water shed if you want to pass on a resilient future. <br /> N <br /> Joe Gardner, citizen, has been designing multi-family plans for Prescott and other cities. <br /> Mr. Gardner identified there are restrictions which limit the zoning ordinance. Factoring <br /> in a 227 acres of high density residential, it creates limitations. Mr. Gardner believes <br /> the commercial area is overdone. He hopes the Council will listen to the people of ° <br /> Prescott as the density is not appropriate for Prescott. <br /> d <br /> E <br /> Ted Wickstrom, citizen, has been flying out of Prescott Airport for 20 years and <br /> represents the Prescott Airport Users Association. Mr. Wickstrom shared that the Deep a <br /> Well Ranch project zone 3 is adjacent to the sixth busiest runway in Arizona. In the last <br /> 20 years there has been 86 accidents at the Prescott Airport. Three of these accidents <br /> occurred in zone 3. The recommendation of the Airport Users Association is that the <br /> open space be preserved in the development agreement perpetuity otherwise more <br /> accidents will occur. <br /> Bill Feldmeier, citizen, said there is good planning and bad planning. He said master <br /> planning is the way to go and supports it. This is a real opportunity for Prescott. It <br /> I Packet Pg.28 I <br />