My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC - Minutes - City Council - 2/18/2014
>
City Clerk
>
Permanent Records
>
Permanent
>
CC - Minutes - City Council - 2/18/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2020 12:15:08 PM
Creation date
11/12/2018 2:34:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC - Minutes
Department
City Clerk
Sub
Clerk Records
Content
Minutes
Committee Status
Current
Document Type
City Council
Meeting Type
SPECIAL
Meeting Date
2/18/2014
Retention
Permanent
Retention Type
Permanent
Security
Public
Scanner
Conversion
Scan Date
3/24/2014
Record Series
GS1016, #10260
Conversion Meeting Type
SPECIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Prescott City Council <br />Special Meeting February 18, 2014 <br />Page 3 <br />growth related plans of the future police station expansion costs resulted in cost per <br />service unit of $71.00. He said that was $113.00 per housing unit and a range of $77.00 <br />to $250.00 for non-residential. <br />Mayor Pro Tern Lamerson asked why a single residential family unit would use police <br />less than an office building. Mr. Rheem explained the methodology of the assessment. <br />Mayor Kuykendall asked if the staff had considered consumption on a per unit basis. <br />Mr. Giardina said they are committing capacity and the ability for the customer to use <br />that capacity. The capital commitment the City is making is intended to be recovered <br />through the impact fee. He said it is not intended to represent the way each person will <br />use the facility. <br />Mr. Rheem noted that collection of fees may be deferred to a date certain until sufficient <br />funding is available. Councilman Arnold noted that if money were collected for a new <br />fire station and within ten years, the City did not have the money to build and/or operate <br />the station; the money would have to be refunded to the property owners with an <br />interest rate. He said that he is concerned with obligating future Council and the <br />community to this project. <br />Mr. McConnell said that early in this process there was a review of the existing impact <br />fees. According to the legislation, some of the fees could no longer be assessed. He <br />noted that some fire stations may not be optimally located. That discussion is not about <br />new growth, but about service delivery and response time. He said that fire and police <br />were added into the project so that they could be examined. As the process proceeds <br />Council and staff will have the opportunity to ask all of the right questions to determine <br />their conclusions. <br />Mr. Giardina said that under the philosophy that growth pays for growth, the existing <br />community has made that investment and growth needs to buy into it. Councilman Blair <br />noted that legislation dictates the way the City of Prescott treats their sewage and the <br />process now has to be changed. He noted that it is not always growth that is causing <br />the City to spend money on a new sewer plant. <br />Mr. Giardina said the cost of that plant, related to meeting new regulations to serve <br />existing customers is not in the impact fees. Councilman Arnold said Council is currently <br />discussing whether this will be a funding source for new fire stations, or if they need to <br />look at alternative methods. <br />Mr. Rheem continued with street facilities and noted that the projects identified for <br />potential fee recovery are Sundog connector roundabout, SR89 (Granite Dells Parkway <br />Interchange) and SR 89 Side Road connector roundabout. He discussed the land uses <br />in each of the area and the preliminary street fee. <br />Mayor Pro Tern Lamerson asked if the impact fee was going to be assessed to retail. <br />Mr. Rheem said yes, based on projected zoning in that service area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.