Laserfiche WebLink
Prescott City Council <br />Special Meeting February 18, 2014 <br />Page 4 <br />Mr. Rheem noted that reimbursement of Streets Fund for debt incurred from previous <br />improvements is not allowed and the City does not currently have identified capacity <br />expanding projects in the area of streets. He said the City is restricted in the service <br />area on how the money is spent and restricted in what the money may go towards. <br />There is no additional capacity improvements programmed in the five year Capital <br />Improvement Projects <br />Mr. McConnell said it was confusing; if the fees were adopted, the City would be <br />keeping impact fees but there would be no projects. <br />Mr. Rheem continued with Utility Fee Components and said that fees are tied to the <br />capacity of the major facilities and are different from street fees. <br />Mr. McConnell said the Infrastructure Improvement Plan is a conservative plan that has <br />been scaled back. He said the anticipated population growth is reasonable. He noted <br />that the City of Prescott has enough land within its existing city limits to exhaust its <br />available water without annexing any more property. <br />There was a discussion about the water system fee. <br />Councilman Arnold asked if the City of Prescott were to look toward centralization of the <br />wastewater treatment plant in the next few years, would the Council and staff have to <br />re-evaluate the fees. Mr. McConnell said yes, as they are also required to re-evaluate <br />the fees every five years. <br />Mr. Giardina continued the discussion with preliminary fees versus the fees the City of <br />Prescott has in place. He noted that the fees that are labeled as preliminary are the <br />maximum allowable fees. The Council is free to adopt any fee up to that amount. He <br />noted that the new legislation said that if a police fee, for instance, were adopted, it <br />would have to be assessed to all land use categories. <br />He then discussed preliminary impact fee examples. <br />Next Steps <br />Mr. Giardini showed a schedule with everything geared toward the August 1, 2014 <br />effective date. He said fees can be charged anytime after that date. <br />Mr. McConnell said that the February 25, 2014 date was to consider. The adoption of <br />the IIP and LUA, but that adoption does not commit Council to adopt a fee. <br />Jon Paladini, City Attorney, noted that if new fees do not go into effect August 1, 2014, <br />the old fees do not continue. <br />