Laserfiche WebLink
Prescott City Council <br />Regular Voting Meeting <br />May 13, 2014 <br />Page 3 <br />directed the City Attorney to file a Notice of Appeal (in relation to the Pure Wafer case), <br />she questioned whether a decision had been made at the Executive Session and <br />whether a Notice of Appeal had actually been filed. <br />Jon Paladini, City Attorney, said because the order of the Judge came down as a <br />judgment, which started the 30 day time clock, and the Notice of Appeal had to be filed <br />within 30 days, this was the first Council meeting the action could be agendized to <br />precede with the appeal. He said the Notice of Appeal had been filed to preserve the <br />City's right to appeal the case. No other action had been taken. The action is to <br />authorize the City to proceed forward. <br />Councilwoman Wilcox asked if the Council had been provided any information regarding <br />the cost of an appeal. Mr. Paladini said that he thought he provided that information in a <br />memo. Councilwoman Wilcox indicated she did not receive the memo. <br />Councilwoman Wilcox said there was a fine line between directing the attorney to file a <br />Notice of Appeal and making a decision to appeal a case. A decision cannot be made in <br />Executive Session and the Council needs more information before it decides to appeal <br />a case, as it can be expensive and may or may not be the right thing to do. <br />Mr. Paladini said this item asks Council to make a decision to allow outside Counsel to <br />proceed forward with the appeal in this case. He said the discussion for the reasons <br />why were done in Executive Session. <br />Councilwoman Wilcox said it seemed there was direction given to him to file a Notice of <br />Appeal. Mr. Paladini said it was done in order to preserve the City's right. If the City had <br />not been able to file the Notice of Appeal, the City may have lost the ability all together. <br />Councilwoman Wilcox said that it seemed that item could have been an action item on <br />the Regular Meeting Agenda the same day as the Executive Session, if that had been <br />the intent. <br />Councilman Blair said Councilwoman Wilcox's question regarding cost was answered in <br />the Executive Session. <br />Mr. Paladini said he recommended going into Executive Session because he was not <br />comfortable talking about legal strategies in an ongoing litigation case, in public. <br />Councilwoman Wilcox said she did not think they needed to go into Executive Session if <br />the Council had been provided information about the cost. She said she was concerned <br />about the process and would like to see an open meeting decision scheduled the same <br />day or soon after an Executive Session. <br />MAYOR PRO TEM LAMERSON MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE ATTORNEY TO FILE <br />AN APPEAL IN CASE NO. CV-13-08236-PCT-JAT, PURE WAFER ADV. CITY OF <br />