My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC - Minutes - City Council - 8/29/2006
>
City Clerk
>
Permanent Records
>
Permanent
>
CC - Minutes - City Council - 8/29/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2020 12:18:46 PM
Creation date
11/12/2018 2:42:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC - Minutes
Department
City Clerk
Sub
Clerk Records
Content
Minutes
Committee Status
Current
Document Type
City Council
Meeting Type
REGULAR
Meeting Date
8/29/2006
Retention
Permanent
Retention Type
Permanent
Security
Public
Scanner
Conversion
Scan Date
8/29/2006
Record Series
GS1016, #10260
Conversion Meeting Type
REGULAR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Prescott City Council Regular Voting Meeting—August 29,2006 Page 12 <br /> Councilman Roecker asked Mr. Spencer if the speed limit was 25 mph <br /> and Mr. Spencer replied it was. He said there were apartment units at <br /> Devereaux and Eastwood and more were being planned and this caused <br /> more traffic problems in the area. <br /> Jeff Carmon,714 City Lights— <br /> • This was not a retirement community and he asked Council to <br /> picture the area at 7:30 in the morning as people tried to go to <br /> work. Cars would be lined up at the intersection at Nathan Lane. <br /> • Nathan Lane had a steep hill in the middle. <br /> • The safety issues were enormous; the traffic issues were <br /> enormous and more homes shouldn't be put in. <br /> Mayor Simmons asked if there was anyone in the audience who wanted <br /> to say something positive about the project. <br /> Carl Whitted, 730 John Drive- had a head-on collision several years ago <br /> because the roadways were narrow in this area. <br /> Cynthia Marroquin,546 Broadview Drive,Quail Hollow Subdivision— <br /> • Surprised Mr. Reuillard knew how bad traffic was when he didn't <br /> live there yet. <br /> • Half-acre to three-quarter acre lots were not dense. <br /> • Roads were in poor shape <br /> • Tenney's were being punished for being the last to develop. <br /> • Their subdivision(Quail Hollow)had no open space. <br /> • Would only be an extra 40-50 cars a day. <br /> • Project was conducive to the environment; the blind corner had <br /> been addressed; had fixed the cul-de-sac. <br /> • There would be a little more traffic on City Lights. <br /> • Adding a few more lots wouldn't make a big difference. <br /> Cynthia Marroquin added she was asked to speak for Randy and <br /> Jennifer Nieffenegger, 601 MacDonald Street,who couldn't attend today's <br /> meeting and they were in support of this project. <br /> John Reynolds,630 David Drive— <br /> • Opposed the proposed subdivision. <br /> • Penn Avenue and Eastwood Drive were in poor condition. <br /> • Supported those who opposed this project. <br /> khr <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.