Laserfiche WebLink
Prescott City Council Regular Voting Meeting—August 29,2006 Page 13 <br /> Shawn Vasteen, 149 S.Virginia Street— <br /> • Supported The Homestead project. <br /> • The road conditions in Prescott were not the Tenney's problems; <br /> the city needed to address the problems. <br /> • The homes in The Homestead 36 homes on 19 acres, would not <br /> be built overnight. <br /> • He didn't see cars going fast down Virginia Street. <br /> • The Tenney's should be allowed to build their subdivision. <br /> It was clarified the Tenney's could build on the SF-35 zoning they had. <br /> Rojene Madsen, 310 S. Mt.Vernon— <br /> • Suggested the Tenney's sell half of the additional lots to Habitat for <br /> Humanity at 1980 prices. <br /> • As traffic on S. Mt. Vernon increased it was turning into a parking lot <br /> and the alleys couldn't be used. <br /> Mayor Simmons commented there were a number of undeveloped, pre- <br /> approved subdivisions coming on board and he was worried about adding <br /> to the problem and concerned Council's actions would make matters <br /> worse. <br /> Harold Tenney commented they were sensitive to what everyone was <br /> saying but other connector roads were needed in the area to relieve the <br /> traffic problems;they didn't cause the issue and they weren't the solution. <br /> Mr. Tenney proposed the City issue them a conditional permit based on 36 <br /> lots and the permit would allow the building of 18 lots and the other 18 lots <br /> would not be built on until another connector road was put into the area. <br /> Councilman Blair asked Public Works Director Craig McConnell what stage <br /> the South Prescott Circulation Plan was in and Mr. McConnell replied <br /> interviews were going to be held Friday to select the engineer to prepare <br /> the study. <br /> Mayor Simmons asked how Mr. Tenney's suggestion could be handled <br /> and Mr. Guice responded the Council could approve the plat with the <br /> condition that only half of the lots could be developed and someone would <br /> have to monitor the project. <br /> Attorney Gary Kidd interjected this was posted as a rezoning request from <br /> SF-35 to SF-18 and any change would mean a modification of that <br /> rezoning request and would be a conditional rezoning. <br />