My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC - Minutes - City Council - 8/29/2006
>
City Clerk
>
Permanent Records
>
Permanent
>
CC - Minutes - City Council - 8/29/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2020 12:18:46 PM
Creation date
11/12/2018 2:42:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC - Minutes
Department
City Clerk
Sub
Clerk Records
Content
Minutes
Committee Status
Current
Document Type
City Council
Meeting Type
REGULAR
Meeting Date
8/29/2006
Retention
Permanent
Retention Type
Permanent
Security
Public
Scanner
Conversion
Scan Date
8/29/2006
Record Series
GS1016, #10260
Conversion Meeting Type
REGULAR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Prescott City Council Regular Voting Meeting—August 29,2006 Page 6 <br /> • There had been opposition to the rezoning and the plat at higher density (36 lots) and the protests would require a supermajority <br /> vote of Council. <br /> Councilman Blair asked what the zoning was on the surrounding <br /> properties before they were developed and Mr.Guice responded SF-35,2 <br /> acre zoning. <br /> Mr. Guice continued State Statutes required the City to do one of three <br /> things to notify the public of an upcoming public hearing, (1) advertise a <br /> legal notice in the newspaper, (2) post a notice on the property, or, <br /> (3)mail public hearing notices to all residents within 300 feet of property. <br /> The City did all three notifications, actually hand delivering the notices <br /> because of the change of date in Council meetings and notices were sent <br /> to residents outside the required area. <br /> Carl Tenney, Agent for the property owners, Tenney Feed and Livestock <br /> Co., which were his brother and sister, Harold Tenney and Jeanine <br /> Tenney Brown,addressed the Council. He showed a map of the property <br /> which was bordered on the north by Acker Park, on the east by the <br /> Foothills Subdivision, on the south by unsubdivided property in the <br /> County,and on the west by Summit Pointe Estates. <br /> Mr.Tenney continued that the Planning and Zoning Commission and City <br /> staff were recommending approval of the proposed plans; the plans had <br /> been revised following neighborhood concerns; an alternate access was <br /> included; brush on Nathan Lane had been cut and they had been <br /> responsive to traffic concerns. <br /> Mr.•Tenney continued, stating that the property had been continuously <br /> occupied by the Tenney Family since the 1920's and some of the land <br /> had been sold off over the years and the remaining 19 acres was left to <br /> be developed. Mr.Tenney showed an area map of the other subdivisions <br /> already established and those were SF-35 and rezoned when the <br /> subdivision was ready to be developed;the Tenney family was asking for <br /> a rezoning from SF-35 which would allow approximately 18 lots to SF-18 <br /> which would allow a total of 36 lots; the City had rezoned 11 times <br /> properties in the area that were SF-35 for a more dense zoning; the <br /> Foothills Subdivision received SF-12PAD which required open space and <br /> 87 lots were developed which dramatically changed the neighborhood; <br /> Summit Pointe Estates was also a PAD which provided open space on <br /> the east side of their parcel which was next to the proposed Homestead <br /> Subdivision. <br /> ki r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.