My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC - Agendas - City Council - WORKSHOP - 10/28/2008
>
City Clerk
>
Permanent Records
>
Permanent
>
CC - Agendas - City Council - WORKSHOP - 10/28/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2020 11:48:05 AM
Creation date
11/13/2018 11:00:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC - Agendas
Department
City Clerk
Sub
Clerk Records
Content
Agendas
Committee Status
Current
Document Type
City Council
Meeting Type
WORKSHOP
Meeting Date
10/28/2008
Retention
Permanent
Retention Type
Permanent
Security
Public
Scanner
Conversion
Scan Date
11/13/2018
Record Series
GS1016, #10260
Supplemental fields
Conversion Number
1380881
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
still undetermined. If we need to contribute more, and find we need to import <br />more water to do it, we have until 2025 to do our part. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />There are other alternatives to the Big Chino Pipeline to extend our water supply. <br />One is enhanced water conservation measures for new development and <br />another is using or recharging more rainfall. <br />What if Prescott implemented strong water conservation measures for new <br />developments such as those now being discussed in Chino Valley? Such <br />measures state that city -provided potable water can only be used for exterior <br />landscaping if there is an equal amount of recharge provided. Under such a <br />provision, developers could build more than twice the number of homes on the <br />same amount of available water. The available 1840 acre-feet and the applied -for <br />additional 1672 acre-feet could provide for more than 34 years' water allocations <br />-- possibly taking us to a total population of nearly 100,000. Even less strict <br />measures could produce additional years of new growth. <br />It is unclear how much new usable water could be obtained through a program of <br />use or recharge of rainfall. It is also unclear whether a large-scale rainwater <br />catchment program is economically feasible. The Upper Verde Watershed <br />Protection Coalition has committed to -examining this augmentation opportunity <br />to determine how it may fit into our future water portfolio. <br />The pipeline has been termed a "bridge" to get Prescott and Prescott Valley to a <br />long-term sustainable water supply. Such a supply (possibly from the Colorado <br />River, as is now being considered by a Bureau of Reclamation study) will not be <br />available soon. But if we can get to 2025 without Big Chino water, then we may <br />be able to skip the Big Chino "bridge" and go directly to a sustainable Tong -term <br />supply. We need to wait for the study results (expected in about three years) <br />which will help us define what we need for a sustainable water budget. <br />CWAG believes these and other options should be considered as alternatives to <br />the Big Chino pipeline. <br />According to a Central Arizona Partnership report, Prescott Valley has enough <br />water to grow until 2031. Considering the growth capability of both communities <br />and the financial, legal and environmental issues surrounding the pipeline, <br />CWAG believes it would be prudent to resolve these issues before committing to <br />the Big Chino project. Specifically, the communities would have time to complete <br />a Habitat Conservation Plan, which would resolve the legal and environmental <br />challenges. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.