CC - Agendas - City Council - REGULAR - 11/4/2008

Home

Prescott City Council Regular Voting Meeting — October 28, 2008 Page 7 Mr. McDowell said that last week they had a draft contract and they have reviewed it with Mr. Fann and the final contract has the same context, with a few minor changes. He added that the contractor did not have to give the City a fuel surcharge credit, and he wanted to thank him for that. Councilwoman Suttles asked for clarification. Mr. McDowell said that when OPUS goes above $4 gallon, the City gives them additional monies; when it goes below $4 gallon, the contractor will give the City a credit. COUNCILMAN LUZIUS MOVED TO AWARD A FIVE-YEAR CONTRACT TO FANN CONTRACTING, INC. FOR HAULING SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $12.79 PER TON, WITH AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $805,770.00 PER YEAR; SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN LAMERSON; PASSED 6-0 WITH COUNCILMAN BELL ABSTAINING. D. Award of bid to Fann Contracting, Inc. for the North Prescott Regional Force Main Replacement Project, along State Highway 89 from Lillian Lane to Willow Creek, in an amount not to exceed $4,081,000.00. Mr. Nietupski briefly reviewed the project. COUNCILWOMAN LOPAS MOVED TO AWARD A BID TO FANN CONTRACTING, INC. FOR THE NORTH PRESCOTT REGIONAL FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT, ALONG STATE HIGHWAY 89 FROM LILLIAN LANE TO WILLOW CREEK, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $4,081,000.00; SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN LUZIUS; PASSED 6-0 WITH COUNCILMAN BELL ABSTAINING. E. Adoption of Ordinance No. 4673-0916 — An ordinance of the Mayor and Council of the City of Prescott, Yavapai County, Arizona, vacating and abandoning certain municipal rights-of-way which consist of portions of Garden Street and an alley located west of and parallel to Grove Avenue south of Sheldon Street and sell and convey to Prescott College and authorizing the Mayor and City staff to take all necessary steps to effectuate such vacations and abandonments. Mr. Nietupski said that this was a request from Prescott College to enhance their campus environment and eliminate cut-through traffic in the alley. Councilwoman Suttles said that it was coming to them as one ordinance, but it was really two different issues, and asked if it could be split out. If not, then it would be a no vote for her. Councilman Roecker said that he agreed; he was not in favor of Garden Street being closed or sold.