Laserfiche WebLink
Prescott City Council <br /> Regular Voting Meeting — October 28, 2008 Page 14 <br /> Steve Blair, 1802 Northside, said that he was glad to see Councilman Luzius <br /> sitting there, no matter what he may say from time to time, he does respect <br /> him. He said that they had dialogue about a 5,000 sq. ft. home that if it had a <br /> sprinkling system, they would be allowed to have a 5/8" meter. With this <br /> change of rates, he asked if that would change. Councilman Luzius said that <br /> would not change. <br /> Mr. Blair said that he agreed with Councilman Lamerson. If they believe they <br /> are going to hang the bone around the person moving into the community <br /> and charge all the rates based on new growth, they are not going to fix their <br /> infrastructure. There has to be a combination of property tax, to fix what is <br /> there now, plus an element that is tied to growth. He said that he has not <br /> heard anyone talk seriously about a property tax increase. Back in the day of <br /> Phil King, the Councils reduced and reduced. They are in a time right now <br /> where they need to have a property tax increase to pay for a lot of the <br /> underground infrastructure that has been in place for years. <br /> Mr. Blair said that they had a sewer line blow up right behind Mountain Oak <br /> Charter School and the citizens of the City paid for the repair and the <br /> damage to the school. He asked how many times they are going to allow <br /> that to happen. <br /> Mayor Wilson said that, as stated earlier by Councilwoman Lopas, the water <br /> rates were raised substantially to pay for repairs and the growth is paying for <br /> new construction. Mr. Blair said that he would suggest then that they change <br /> the General Plan that states "fixture units" to determine the fees. <br /> Chris Hoy, 1880 Coyote Road, said that he was the President of CWAG and <br /> was there to read a four-sentence statement, approved by the Board of <br /> Directors, "Water and wastewater infrastructure for new users should not be <br /> subsidized by current residents. If water use is subsidized, our goal of <br /> conservation will be substantially negated. CWAG supports full and fair <br /> impact fees for all new users. If the jurisdictions wish to promote work-force <br /> housing or other new construction, they should do so in a way that does not <br /> subsidize the cost of water or discourage conservation." <br /> Leslie Hoy, 1880 Coyote Road, said that she was speaking as a member of <br /> the "impact fee committee" that was put together on August 26, when she <br /> volunteered as a citizen, and later Howard Mechanic and John Danforth also <br /> became members of the committee. The citizens were only invited to <br /> participate in the committee twice, although there were a lot of other <br /> meetings that went on. Mr. McConnell was pretty good about keeping a <br /> record of the correspondence, which they did receive. She had to leave <br /> early at the last meeting so she wrote to Mr. McConnell a question regarding <br /> the suggestion to delay implementation of the fees for an additional six <br />