My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC - Minutes - City Council - 5/13/2014 (3)
>
City Clerk
>
Permanent Records
>
Permanent
>
CC - Minutes - City Council - 5/13/2014 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2020 12:17:08 PM
Creation date
11/12/2018 2:40:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC - Minutes
Department
City Clerk
Sub
Clerk Records
Content
Minutes
Committee Status
Current
Document Type
City Council
Meeting Type
REGULAR
Meeting Date
5/13/2014
Retention
Permanent
Retention Type
Permanent
Security
Public
Scanner
Conversion
Scan Date
7/11/2014
Record Series
GS1016, #10260
Conversion Meeting Type
REGULAR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Prescott City Council <br />Regular Voting Meeting <br />May 13, 2014 <br />Page 9 <br />MAYOR PRO TEM LAMERSON MOVED TO AWARD CITY CONTRACT NO. 2014- <br />166 TO WAYNE HARDING & ASSOCIATES, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED <br />$30,000.00; SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN ARNOLD; PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. <br />MAYOR PRO TEM LAMERSON MOVED TO AWARD CITY CONTRACT NO. 2014- <br />167 TO ROGER L. DUNLAP AND ASSOCIATES, LTD, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO <br />EXCEED $30,000.00; SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN LAZZELL: PASSED <br />UNANIMOUSLY. <br />H. Adoption of Resolution No. 4225-1434 approving the Impact Fee Report and <br />adopting a Fee Schedule for Impact Fees pursuant to Arizona Revised <br />Statutes §9-463.05. <br />Mark Woodfill, Finance Director, presented. He displayed the schedule of events and <br />said this was the 11t" meeting with the Council and public relating to Impact fees. <br />Craig McConnell, City Manager, said there was discussion regarding this item the <br />previous week. Page two of the resolution in the packet sets forth some options. The <br />Council could select one of the following: <br />1) Not charge police development impact fees and not charge fire and EMS <br />development fees, which is the staff recommendation. <br />2) Council can defer the charging of police and fire impact fees from the effective <br />date of August 1, 2014 — January 1, 2015, which are arbitrary dates. <br />3) Council could determine another alternative. <br />Mr. McConnell said the City of Prescott does not have the money to operate new fire <br />stations and is not in the position to recommend that a fire station be built and collect <br />Ilkw impact fees to help pay for the station. He said the same was true for police facilities. <br />Councilman Arnold wanted to be clear that if Council chose to defer the fees, it was the <br />consultant's opinion that Council could only defer them for approximately six months. <br />He asked if that was just the consultant's opinion and not a legal opinion. <br />Mr. Woodfill responded that it was the consultant's opinion. <br />Councilman Arnold asked that if in two years, future Council chooses to re-evaluate the <br />fire and police fees, the City would be required to go through the same extensive <br />process. <br />Mr. Woodfill said that was spelled out in the statutes. The City would have to go through <br />the process which may take approximately 18 months. <br />Councilman Arnold said he would support staff's recommendation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.