My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC - Agendas - City Council - REGULAR - 5/14/2019
>
City Clerk
>
Permanent Records
>
Permanent
>
CC - Agendas - City Council - REGULAR - 5/14/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2020 11:47:57 AM
Creation date
5/15/2019 1:53:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC - Agendas
Department
City Clerk
Sub
Clerk Records
Content
Agendas
Committee Status
Current
Document Type
City Council
Meeting Type
REGULAR
Meeting Date
5/14/2019
Retention
Permanent
Retention Type
Permanent
Security
Public
Scanner
COP\francis.beegle
Scan Date
5/15/2019
Record Series
GS1016, #10260
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I 11.D.b I <br /> lowest rank.based,on the pricing submitted. Cost Formula was utilized for all lines to determine a:`-`score <br /> for each line item given a weight of 100 points each. After all lines were evaluated,an average score was <br /> calculated,which then received a Rank score from h ighest to lowest. Af}er:initial ranking of all firms was <br /> established,an analytic review of the scope of services was performed to review what each firm offered in <br /> the contract by category; After categories were reviewed,regions and locations were also analyzed to <br /> determine if the members of 1 GPA that are located outside of Mar'icopa County and Arizona would have <br /> coverage for the contract nationally. <br /> It-is determined that a single award is not advantageous to cooperative members of 1GPA. The n <br /> solicitation authorized multiple awards to meet the needs of 1 GPA's various types of members'needs and <br /> locationsin Arizona and in other states. Award is recommended to the least number of Offerors which 1 <br /> D. <br /> offered the most advantageous proposals. The decision is based upon considerations for 1GPA members <br /> to select firms based on the scope of services needed and offered by each firm,vendor's ability to provide <br /> for a diverse membership,and locations served. A detailed summary of the,recommendation to award <br /> each firm is provided with the Multiple Award Justification. <br /> co <br /> This is a inult year contract beginning-from date of award for one year. The contract may be extended up re <br /> to a maximum of four(4)additional years on a year-to-year basis: Annual renewals would be based. c <br /> solely on the determination of 1GPA as to the performance,costs and general quality of the services <br /> provided by the successful vendors selected. <br /> a. <br /> o) <br /> co <br /> tY <br /> 4444-1 " <br /> ss <br /> a nrib J N <br /> 43 <br /> Jennifer Munoz - Jill Broussard, c <br /> Director of Procurement&Compliance County Superintendent <br /> 1GPA Pinal County ESA <br /> 0 <br /> i c • <br /> a) <br /> c <br /> E <br /> 0 <br /> a. <br /> 0 <br /> c <br /> d <br /> E <br /> t <br /> 0 <br /> 111 <br /> . a <br /> 1910 W.Washington.St.,Phoenix,AZ.85009 <br /> _ . - www.1GPA.org <br /> Packet Pg. 171 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.