My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC - Agendas - City Council - REGULAR - 8/29/2006
>
City Clerk
>
Permanent Records
>
Permanent
>
CC - Agendas - City Council - REGULAR - 8/29/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2022 4:28:20 PM
Creation date
3/2/2022 11:10:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC - Agendas
Department
City Clerk
Sub
Clerk Records
Content
Agendas
Committee Status
Current
Document Type
City Council
Meeting Type
REGULAR
Meeting Date
8/29/2006
Retention
Permanent
Retention Type
Permanent
Security
Public
Scanner
COP\torey.dawson
Scan Date
3/2/2022
Record Series
GS1016, #10260
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AOilk <br /> Although previous councils have opted against nonresidential impact fees, the recent studies have <br /> factored nonresidential use into the calculation in an effort to alleviate the shortfalls created by a <br /> residential only impact fee. The nonresidential fee is not imposed for nonresidential services such <br /> as parks, recreation and library since nearly all of these services are geared towards residential <br /> users.The table below reflects the proposed nonresidential fees per 1,000 square feet: <br /> Proposed Impact Fees: Nonresidential Units (per 1,000 s.f.) 2001 2006 <br /> Fire 435 871 <br /> Police 365 624 <br /> Public Buildings & Fleet 275 282 <br /> Streets* 469 469 <br /> Total 1,544 2,246 <br /> *The streets impact fee is not included in this update will be considered separately. The <br /> proposed fee from 2001 is included in the proposed 2006 amounts. <br /> It could be argued that commercial development places an increased burden on our police and fire <br /> departments as well as many of the public buildings. Commercial fees are reflected in the report <br /> update in the event that the Council desires to expand the fees to include commercial <br /> development. Most jurisdictions are imposing nonresidential fees that average $3,513 as shown in <br /> the survey results in the appendix. <br /> These fees presented in the report should be considered the "ceiling" or the highest allowable <br /> ,r. based on the methodology used. The City Council has the discretion to reduce or entirely eliminate <br /> any of these fees as long as it is done in a nondiscriminatory manner. However, a reduction in <br /> development fee revenue will dictate an increase in other revenues, a decrease in planned capital <br /> expenditures and/or a decrease in the City's SL standards. <br /> Development Fee Inflation Escalator <br /> All costs in the development fee calculations are given in current dollars, we recommend an annual <br /> inflation adjustment to the fees based on the rapidly rising construction costs we have experienced <br /> on our large projects. The adjustment factor should be based on the change in construction costs <br /> according to the Engineering News Record (ENR) 20 City Construction Cost Index. The first <br /> escalation should be imposed on January 1, 2007 and each succeeding January 1 until the study is <br /> revised or updated.The Appendix includes an example of how the escalator will be applied. <br /> Demographics <br /> The table below reflects the demographics at the time of each impact fee study: <br /> % Increase <br /> 1994 2001 2005 from 1994 <br /> Population 30,815 33,938 41,050 33.2% <br /> Average household size 2.11 2.11 - <br /> Estimated residential units 15,029 17,916 21,005 39.8% <br /> Estimated nonresidential square footage 4,646,551 7,784,105 11,732,249 152.5% <br /> Annual new residential units 519 503 715 37.8% <br /> Annual new nonresidential square footage 128,341 627,511 789,623 515.3% <br /> 4111. <br /> Projected dwelling units at build out 21,894 24,092 31,000 41.6% <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.