My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC - Agendas - City Council - REGULAR - 8/29/2006
>
City Clerk
>
Permanent Records
>
Permanent
>
CC - Agendas - City Council - REGULAR - 8/29/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2022 4:28:20 PM
Creation date
3/2/2022 11:10:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC - Agendas
Department
City Clerk
Sub
Clerk Records
Content
Agendas
Committee Status
Current
Document Type
City Council
Meeting Type
REGULAR
Meeting Date
8/29/2006
Retention
Permanent
Retention Type
Permanent
Security
Public
Scanner
COP\torey.dawson
Scan Date
3/2/2022
Record Series
GS1016, #10260
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Additional demographic information is contained in the appendix. <br /> Additional considerations and fees imposed by surrounding communities: <br /> 1. Impact fees are based on maintaining current capital facility Service Levels. The City Council <br /> may choose not to do so. The Council may determine that the City can't afford to continue this <br /> level. A decline in service level would reduce the impact fee. <br /> 2. Impact fees can't fund maintenance and operational expenses. Consequently, these costs must <br /> be absorbed by other revenue sources. The expansion of capital facilities has a correlating increase <br /> on maintenance and operational expenses. These expenses vary depending on the facility added. <br /> For example, a fire station may cost $2,000,000 to acquire the land, construct and equip, while the <br /> operational and maintenance costs could be as high as $500,000 per year. <br /> 3. The City needs to demonstrate specific planned uses for impact fees and the fees should <br /> generally be expended within six to ten years. Major capital projects may take closer to ten years <br /> to generate the required funding; in these cases, preliminary planning should begin within the six- <br /> year period. <br /> 4. Housing affordability may decline since impact fees generally increase the cost of construction; <br /> residential rental rates may also increase. At the same time, impact fees help maintain a <br /> community's quality of life, and enhance the value of property. <br /> 5. Impact fees on non-residential development may have a real or perceived adverse effect on new <br /> business development. Since development costs would rise, a business could argue that it would <br /> operate at a competitive disadvantage. At least 21 cities and towns impose impact fees on non- <br /> residential development. Chino Valley, Sedona, Wickenburg, Casa Grande, Gilbert, Glendale and <br /> Peoria are just a few of the cities that impose impact fees on non-residential development.The fees <br /> imposed by other cities and towns are included in the appendix. <br /> 6. Prescott Valley currently imposes residential impact fees totaling $2,711. Nonresidential impact <br /> fees were to become effective August 6, 2006 but have been delayed two years until August 2008. <br /> Chino Valley currently imposes impact fees totaling $3,835 for residential and $1,180 for <br /> nonresidential. Yavapai County imposes a roadway impact fee for two "benefit areas". The western <br /> benefit area is the area covering Prescott, Cordes Lakes, and Chino Valley ($1,200); the eastern area <br /> is near the Verde Valley ($1,100). The impact fees for both jurisdictions are imposed on residential <br /> dwelling units. <br /> The appendix contains surveys of several cities regarding impact fees; although the survey is not <br /> exhaustive it does provide a good basis for comparison. 26 jurisdictions were included in the survey. <br /> The average fee charged on residential units amounted to $3,886 while non residential fees <br /> averaged $3,513 for Arizona cities and towns. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.