My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC - Minutes - City Council - 5/13/2014 (3)
>
City Clerk
>
Permanent Records
>
Permanent
>
CC - Minutes - City Council - 5/13/2014 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2020 12:17:08 PM
Creation date
11/12/2018 2:40:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC - Minutes
Department
City Clerk
Sub
Clerk Records
Content
Minutes
Committee Status
Current
Document Type
City Council
Meeting Type
REGULAR
Meeting Date
5/13/2014
Retention
Permanent
Retention Type
Permanent
Security
Public
Scanner
Conversion
Scan Date
7/11/2014
Record Series
GS1016, #10260
Conversion Meeting Type
REGULAR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Prescott City Council <br />Regular Voting Meeting <br />May 13, 2014 <br />Page 11 <br />on value and Prescott's impact fees are based on a flat amount. There are a number of <br />lots in Prescott that are vacant, have water and were platted well before the 1998 <br />mandate. He said those lots can be used for starter houses. The lots are being <br />bypassed by builders because the cost per square foot is higher than for a builder who <br />has a $500,000.00 house on $200,000.00 of land. They each pay $15,500.00 for impact <br />fees. <br />Mayor Kuykendall asked if this was an option. <br />Mr. Woodfill said that it was not an option. He said public safety fees were done on a <br />square foot basis for commercial uses, but overall, water and wastewater are done on <br />meter size. He noted that fees for homes will differ depending on what zone the home is <br />in. <br />Mr. McConnell said this is the methodology prescribed by law; the City does not have <br />the ability to modify the methodology. The reasoning is that it is an assessment on the <br />impact on infrastructure. <br />Councilman Kuknyo asked if everyone in the state does it the same way. Mr. Woodfill <br />said yes. <br />COUNCILWOMAN WILCOX MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 4225-1434 <br />WITH OPTION 2 AS OUTLINED IN THE STAFF REPORT, TO CHARGE ZERO <br />DOLLAR AND ZERO CENT ($0.00) RATES FOR EACH OF FIRE AND EMS <br />DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AND POLICE DEPARTMENT IMPACT FEES FROM <br />AUGUST 1, 2014, UNTIL JANUARY 1, 2015, AT WHICH TIME SAID IMPACT FEES <br />SHALL COMPORT WITH DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES SCHEDULE OF EXHIBIT <br />B; SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN BLAIR; <br />COUNCILMAN ARNOLD OFFERED AN AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION TO <br />INCLUDE A DATE CERTAIN OF ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 9, 2014, TO <br />EVALUATE WHETHER OR NOT THE COUNCIL CHOOSES TO COLLECT THOSE <br />FEES, PRIOR TO JANUARY 1, 2015. COUNCILWOMAN WILCOX ACCEPTED THE <br />AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION. <br />MOTION PASSED 6-1, (COUNCILMAN LAZZELL DISSENTING.) <br />Award of bid and contract for the Willow Creek Dam Repairs Project to <br />Technology Construction, Inc., in the amount not $180,000.00 (City Contract <br />No. 2014-182; Water Fund) <br />Tim Burkeen, Capital Program Manager, presented. He said it was the second in a <br />series of projects to repair the dams. He said the dam was constructed in 1935 and was <br />in fairly good shape. There was some surface deterioration on the concrete. He noted <br />that safety railing and security fencing also needed to be installed. The contract allows <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.